<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>PostRank Blog - Latest Comments in A response on how PostRank works</title><link>http://aiderss.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://aiderss.disqus.com/a_response_on_how_postrank_works/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:15:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A response on how PostRank works</title><link>http://blog.postrank.com/2009/01/a-response-on-how-postrank-works/#comment-5790155</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"PostRank scores in the widget and PostRank scores on the website are calculated slightly differently"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Melle, I think that PostRank absolutely rawks. But I think you can improve it further to make it more useful as part of an enterprise analytics suite.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A basic rule of measurement is that I should be able to compare results against a baseline. A second rule is that I should be able to replicate the results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Right now, it's not easy to do either with PostRank. It would be great if you could tackle this challenge.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thornley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:15:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A response on how PostRank works</title><link>http://blog.postrank.com/2009/01/a-response-on-how-postrank-works/#comment-5790154</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I completely agree, and it's something we're working on all the time. It's a slow process, sometimes, since it seems everyone learns differently online. Sometimes text, sometimes graphics, sometimes video...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, no one's completely cracked Google's algorithms, and they're doing alright for themselves. :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Until the day we don't need explanations, I guess I've got some job security. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Melanie</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:45:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A response on how PostRank works</title><link>http://blog.postrank.com/2009/01/a-response-on-how-postrank-works/#comment-5790153</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I left a reply for you in the link above (see profile link), but I think you've answered my concerns yourself:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"And certainly it can be a bit convoluted to understand if you haven’t been provided with the right explanatory examples."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For you guys to hit the big time, PostRank needs to make sense without the explanations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I know you're working to improve things, so I wish you the best of luck!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy Beal</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:50:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>