<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>AideRSS Blog - Latest Comments in Announcing the AideRSS PostRank RSS Extension</title><link>http://aiderss.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 21:48:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Announcing the AideRSS PostRank RSS Extension</title><link>http://blog.postrank.com/2007/12/04/announcing-the-aiderss-postrank-rss-extension/#comment-5788088</link><description>Since PostRank isn't (AFAICT) a trademark, isn't it actually *better* to namespace it with aiderss?  Conceivably, in the future, I might want to see PostRank data from AideRSS, GoogleKnowsEverythingRSS, FacebookWereWatchingYouRSS, etc., all mashed up into one feed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean, er, not that I'd ever need another service besides AideRSS.  Of course not.  But, still.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jay Levitt</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 21:48:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing the AideRSS PostRank RSS Extension</title><link>http://blog.postrank.com/2007/12/04/announcing-the-aiderss-postrank-rss-extension/#comment-5788087</link><description>The motivation behind this extension was to expose PostRank in readers beyond our "My Feeds" reader.  Currently we're the only ones who can calculate PostRank so I'm not sure what dropping the brand name accomplishes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, perhaps what people are suggesting, and I'm reading between the lines of Daniel's comment, is to use PostRank as a factor in portable data format like APML -- see &lt;a href="http://www.apml.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.apml.org&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:16:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing the AideRSS PostRank RSS Extension</title><link>http://blog.postrank.com/2007/12/04/announcing-the-aiderss-postrank-rss-extension/#comment-5788086</link><description>Plus 1 on the dropping of the brand name. Otherwise, a fine idea.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Hanselman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:25:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing the AideRSS PostRank RSS Extension</title><link>http://blog.postrank.com/2007/12/04/announcing-the-aiderss-postrank-rss-extension/#comment-5788085</link><description>Daniel, could you expand on the "define a way to pitch in data from AideRSS"? Are you thinking an API to retrieve the story PostRank, or do you have something else in mind?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">igrigorik</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 16:03:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Announcing the AideRSS PostRank RSS Extension</title><link>http://blog.postrank.com/2007/12/04/announcing-the-aiderss-postrank-rss-extension/#comment-5788084</link><description>Drop your brand name in the namespace and it will be all fine. Make it a generic ranking operator and define a way to pitch in data from aideRSS.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Daniel Aleksandersen</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:26:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>